In my favorite segment of Dave Chappelle’s For What It's Worth, poor black people limited to sub-quality “purple drink” have no idea about the concept of juice as derived from an actual fruit. The racial implications of Chappelle’s humor are too complex for me to get into, and not what this post is about, so let’s just say I find the joke profound. In D.F. Wallace’s “This is Water” speech, wherein fish, asking “what is water?” take for granted the most essential constituent of their existence, Wallace ends by telling us “this is water,” meaning, we are the fish, and that cognizance of the things around us, which leads to positive/proactive thinking, is our responsibility. (Of course, one thinks about the last decision he made, an act which deserves reticence.) And so, dear writerly people, at this juncture I ask you what the fuck is cheese?
Cheese, that which is cliche, corny, sentimental, and all other vague no-nos subject to interpretation. “Saint Judas” by James Wright, one of my favorite poems, tip toes on cheesiness with lines which I’ve taken the liberty to strike through:
Saint Judas
When I went out to kill myself, I caught
A pack of hoodlums beating up a man.
Running to spare his suffering, I forgot
My name, my number, how my day began,
How soldiers milled around the garden stone
And sang amusing songs; how all that day
Their javelins measured crowds; how I alone
Bargained the proper coins, and slipped away.
Banished from heaven, I found this victim beaten,
Stripped, kneed, and left to cry. Dropping my rope
Aside, I ran, ignored the uniforms:
Then I remembered bread my flesh had eaten,
The kiss that ate my flesh. Flayed without hope,
I held the man for nothing in my arms.
“Banished from heaven,” “in my arms,” “left to cry,” and “to spare his suffering” reek of some Smashing Pumpkins song. You can always measure how little one has suffered by how much they glorify it — mascara running down the cheek was maybe bought from Maybelene. However, the pain and humanity in “Saint Judas” do seem cloying, and I would prefer my restrained sans strike-throughed version. When writing, I’m constantly asking myself “is this cheesy?” I often wonder, is the fear of cheese nothing more than the flinches of a tired and wounded postmodern psyche? Or are cliches, originally interesting, simply overspent with time? I don’t know; I just know I don’t want any hugs or tears in my Saint Judas.
The hardened heart is a mysterious thing; the time we exist in is one of emotional penuriousness. If it smells fishy, some goat cheese and dill won’t hurt. Literature, like food, may just be a matter of taste — though cheese is an ambiguous matter. Our brains have two eyes attached at the front; the heart, blind, only has nipples. Nobody intends to be cheesy — it’s just so hard to stay sharp, but brie brave, not get feta up, and wish for gouda luck.
good post. enjoyed the cheesy puns at the end :)
ReplyDeleteAren't "banished from heaven" and "to spare his suffering" lines that ironically echo Biblical language, though? And, in that way, trading on their "cheese?" And "in my arms" the Pieta?
ReplyDeleteAnd, really, isn't there something really striking about the line, "Banished from heaven, I found this victim beaten," when you consider that Wright considers killing himself a kind of heaven?
Turn the cliche the right way, and I say go for it.
Also, great post.
Deletedamn, you're a deeper reader than me
DeleteGood edit of the poem!
ReplyDeleteAs for cheesiness, don't be afraid of it. Fear of cheesiness is fear of making an aesthetic mistake, and we all make them.
For some reason this post reminded me of Tom Waits reading "The Laughing Heart" by Charles Bukowski.
My favorite line: "Your life is your life/You are marvelous" Now that's cheesy.
Dropping my rope
ReplyDeleteAside, I ran, ignored the unicorns:
thats how i originally read those lines and was suprised you didnt comment on them until i realized i am a moron.
you either need glasses or a horn in your head
DeleteI think this is a great post too, but would just throw in the following consideration -- after a little bit of research, I think this poem was written / published in 1959, unless I am mistaken. Any sort of ex post facto critique using today's standards for cheese measurement can only lead to a degree of trouble. Born in 1974 myself, I have no understanding of the innocence of America and American culture pre-1968, let's say (somewhat arbitrarily), so I am guessing that in 1959, this piece might not have even reeked of sentimentality, much less cheesiness. It might have been read / analyzed as being profoundly sincere for all we know. For reference in 1959, think Robert Frost and Carl Sandburg on the one end of the spectrum, and the beat poets on the other, taking up the rebellious side of the argument.
ReplyDeleteAny post that gets the critical brain juices flowing is a great post in my book, so thanks much.
i guess the age-old question is: is cheese time-sensitive?
Delete